REPI 101:
A Guide for State, Local and Private Partners
Introduction
The REPI Program is a key tool for combating encroachment that can limit or restrict military training, testing, and operations. The REPI Program preserves and enhances these military missions by helping remove or avoid land-use conflicts near installations, ranges, and their associated facilities, range infrastructure, and airspace, as well as addressing regulatory restrictions that inhibit military activities.
A key component of the REPI Program is the use of encroachment management partnerships, referred to as REPI projects, among the Military Services, private conservation groups, and state and local governments, authorized by Congress at 10 United States Code (U.S.C.) § 2684a. Congress expanded the 2684a authority in the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2019 (Public Law 115-232) to include agreements that enhance or improve military installation resilience. These win-win partnerships share the cost of acquisition of easements or other interests in land from willing sellers to preserve land uses that are compatible with military missions and natural habitats near installations and ranges that help sustain critical military capabilities.
REPI projects contribute to the longevity of working farms, forests, and ranchlands; increase recreational and open space opportunities for nearby residents and military families; and protect against military relocations that would adversely affect the local economy.
Workarounds are modifications to the timing, tempo, location, or equipment used for test and training. These deviations from doctrinal test and training standards may include: reducing training days or time; segmenting an exercise into discrete steps; or changing flight patterns, limiting live-fire, and using simulations.
View all definitionsIncompatible land uses and habitat loss near and adjacent to installations, ranges, and operating areas threaten our ability to provide our military with the most realistic training.
View all definitionsMilitary installations and corresponding defense-related activities provide states and localities with a robust economy. Jobs that are generated through the military provide tax revenues that help create programs for many communities. The Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation (OLDCC) compiles annual data on state defense spending. This information can be found on OLDCC’s website.
A landowner who voluntarily agrees to sell or donate an interest in their property to the Department of Defense or partner.
View all definitionsMilitary installation resilience is the capability of a military installation to avoid, prepare for, minimize the effect of, adapt to, and recover from extreme weather events, or from anticipated or unanticipated changes in environmental conditions, that do, or have the potential to, adversely affect the military installation or essential transportation, logistical, or other necessary resources outside of the military installation that are necessary in order to maintain, improve, or rapidly reestablish installation mission assurance and mission-essential functions, as defined in 10 U.S.C. 101 (e)(8).
View all definitionsPrimer Purpose
This primer is intended as an introduction for land trusts, state or local governments, and other potential partners. Military personnel who are unfamiliar with REPI projects may also find it useful. The primer is designed to:
-
Help potential partners and military and civilian DOD personnel understand how REPI and the individual Military Service implementation programs work,
-
Outline essential steps to creating a REPI partnership and implementing a REPI project, and
-
Facilitate communication, common understanding, and potential collaboration among stakeholders on compatible land use issues.
The REPI Authority for Agreements to Prevent Encroachment: 10 U.S.C. § 2684a
Enacted by Congress in Fiscal Year (FY) 2003, the authority allows the Military Departments to partner with state and local governments or private conservation groups to cost share the acquisition of easements and other real property interests.
By preserving land near military training, testing, and operations, we can avoid more costly alternatives, such as workarounds, restricted or unrealistic training approaches, increased transit time and costs from traveling to and from locations that don't have encroachment limitations, or training or testing that inadequately prepares the military for its combat missions. Through these partnerships we will continue to cultivate strong community ties that work to enhance the defense of our nation while being stewards of the environment.
Who is the Department of Defense?
The Department of Defense manages approximately 25 million acres of land on about 523 large military installations. Around 342 of these installations have “significant natural resources,” as defined by federal law.
Area equipped for practicing shooting at targets.
View all definitionsDOD is a complex organization and is also America’s largest organization. It is made up of the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD), the three Military Departments (including the four Military Services, each with single-Military Service and joint installations and ranges), the Joint Chiefs of Staffs, and numerous field agencies. Across the entire Department, the OSD provides overarching REPI Program guidance and funding support for the Military Departments’ efforts to protect their installations and ranges and the missions they support.
The three Military Departments within DOD are the Departments of the Army, Air Force, and Navy—the Marine Corps is part of the Department of the Navy. We commonly refer to the “four Military Services” to include Army, Navy, Marine Corps, and Air Force. The Army and Air National Guard are also components within the Army and Air Force. Getting to know our organization is helpful because the Military Services prepare long-term strategies, engage in partnerships, and complete transactions via Military Service-specific processes described in the appendix.
Military ranks are split between officers and enlisted personnel. Officer ranks begin with O-1 (most junior) and go up to O-10 (most senior). Similarly, enlisted personnel ranks begin with E-1 (most junior) and go up to E-9 (most senior). Civilian employees that work alongside officers and enlisted personnel are classified by their General Schedule (GS) scale. The GS scale begins at GS-1 (most junior) and goes up to GS-15 (most senior). Some very senior DOD civilians are classified using the Senior Executive Service (SES) scale, which goes from SES-1 (most junior) to SES-6 (most senior). DOD civilians in the SES scale are equivalent to military General Officers or Flag Officers (Admirals).
DOD’s Impact on the Local Economy
DOD installations positively impact local economies: they bring people to military facilities and nearby areas, employ and pay these individuals, and therefore, create economic stimulation within local communities. The influx of recruits, active duty Military Service members, and civilians generates money that flows from DOD to those individuals, who, in turn, put the money back into the local community. DOD also injects large sums of money into the private sector in regions with a military installation. Some of the industries that benefit from this investment are engineering, construction, research, hospitals, and food services.
The impact also includes environmental stewardship and conservation, energy conservation and alternative energy development, and extensive engagement with local communities. The military goes to great lengths to balance its operations with the protection of plant and animal species as well as human health. Renewable energy implementation and use on installations has grown significantly in recent years, which reduces the burden on our environment from inefficient consumer products and dirty sources of energy.
DOD Organizational Structure
Hover to discover more
DOD MANAGES
27 MILLION ACRES OF LAND
ON ABOUT
523 LARGE MILITARY INSTALLATIONS
AROUND
342 INSTALLATIONS
HAVE SIGNIFICANT NATURAL RESOURCES
AS DEFINED BY FEDERAL LAW.
What is Encroachment?
Military readiness depends upon the solid platform of training and testing capabilities of our Nation’s installations, ranges, and other training and testing spaces. This infrastructure is necessary for conducting daily operations, realistic live-fire training, and effective weapon system testing. Reduced capability and availability of existing land, air, water access, and electromagnetic spectrum put military readiness at risk.
Incompatible land uses and habitat loss near and adjacent to installations, ranges, and operating areas threaten our ability to provide our military with the most realistic training. If warfighters or their units receive restricted or inadequate training, they are less likely to fully understand combat strategies and tactics, leading to insufficient skills or unnecessarily risky practices on the battlefield. Partnering to limit development pressures and preserve habitat is vital to avoiding costly training workarounds and higher future military expenses that strain budgets and risk readiness for our nation’s defense.
Encroachment, whether by land, air, or water, has the potential to impact military training, testing, and operational readiness. These factors do not exist in isolation and many times require a comprehensive, cross-boundary approach to addressing encroachment.
The Department of Defense’s Readiness and Environmental Protection Integration (REPI) program is a key tool for promoting innovative and land conservation partnerships that benefit national defense, neighboring communities, and the environment.
Realistic combat training, pristine test environments, and operations capability are keys to keeping our service members safe. However, encroachment issues are creating obstacles that threaten military activities.
- 80% of military bases have surrounding development that is higher than the national average.
- Flight testing, training, and operations are impeded by cellphone towers, wind farms, and developments.
- Night training is compromised when light pollution from nearby commercial areas spreads.
- Parachute training is halted when housing developments are built near drop sites.
- Weapons testing and training causes noise, dust, and smoke complaints from nearby communities.
- Urban sprawl decreases habitat and may cause Federally protected species to seek sanctuary on military lands.
- Wildfires, floods, and extreme storms result in billions of dollars in damage to military installations and significant readiness impacts.
Encroachment Impacts on Military Readiness
Development near installations, ranges, and operating areas can affect training, testing, and operations in many ways, including:
-
Light from developments near installations and ranges reduces the effectiveness of night-vision training
-
Residents near installations and ranges complain about the noise, dust, and smoke generated by military activities, resulting in restrictions on the timing, frequency, and type of training activities
-
Competition for electromagnetic spectrum impacts military training and test activities; specific examples include limiting critical communication requirements, limiting the number of unmanned aircraft systems able to operate at a given time
-
Communication towers, wind turbines, energy transmission lines, and other tall structures near or through military areas may interfere with flight training routes and sensitive testing equipment
-
Land development that destroys or fragments endangered species habitat around DOD lands increases DOD’s burden to manage species habitat on our less developed land and may result in increased restrictions on training, testing, and operations
Incompatible land use and other forms of encroachment may individually appear to have a minimal effect on the capacity to test and train, but when combined over time, the effects of these pressures multiply. This may ultimately result in irrevocable damage to readiness capabilities.
Addressing Solutions through Partnerships
In many instances, our best option for protecting the operational capabilities of our installations is to enter into partnerships to promote and maintain compatible land uses around installations and ranges. Our partners acquire easements or other interests in land to prevent land use changes that may impact military operations. Meanwhile, the partnerships provide additional environmental, economic, and quality of life benefits to neighbors, communities, and DOD alike.
REPI projects are an innovative way to address land use and resource challenges caused by encroachment. These partnerships give us the ability to effectively leverage our funding with other organizations interested in preserving land and natural resources. These protected areas serve as compatible lands near installations and ranges. Such protected land can also reduce on-installation habitat restrictions while supporting our partners' goals and objectives.
Partners have included all types of organizations:
National land trusts
Landowner associations
State agencies
County governments
City governments
Regional development agencies
For a full list of partners, please visit the REPI website.
Electromagnetic spectrum is the range of frequencies of electromagnetic radiation from zero to infinity. It is divided into 26 alphabetically designated bands.
View all definitionsArea equipped for practicing shooting at targets.
View all definitionsWorkarounds are modifications to the timing, tempo, location, or equipment used for test and training. These deviations from doctrinal test and training standards may include: reducing training days or time; segmenting an exercise into discrete steps; or changing flight patterns, limiting live-fire, and using simulations.
View all definitionsIncompatible land uses and habitat loss near and adjacent to installations, ranges, and operating areas threaten our ability to provide our military with the most realistic training.
View all definitionsA private or governmental entity that provides financial, technical real estate, legal, or other significant support to a Military Service in the pursuit or conduct of a REPI project or transaction. Examples include federal agencies, state and local authorities, national nonprofit conservation organizations, and local land trusts. Eligible entities under section 2684a are a defined subset of partners.
View all definitionsAn interest in land owned by another entity that consists of the right to use or control the land, or an area above or below it, for a specific limited purpose.
View all definitionsHow do REPI projects work?
An easement is a legal right to use another's land for a specific limited purpose; when an entity is granted an easement, it is allowed the legal right to use the property, but the legal title to the land itself remains with the owner of the land. In this case, easements granted to REPI and its partners, allow the program to protect the land by limiting the uses of the land.
View all definitionsA landowner who voluntarily agrees to sell or donate an interest in their property to the Department of Defense or partner.
View all definitionsIncompatible land uses and habitat loss near and adjacent to installations, ranges, and operating areas threaten our ability to provide our military with the most realistic training.
View all definitionsA private or governmental entity that provides financial, technical real estate, legal, or other significant support to a Military Service in the pursuit or conduct of a REPI project or transaction. Examples include federal agencies, state and local authorities, national nonprofit conservation organizations, and local land trusts. Eligible entities under section 2684a are a defined subset of partners.
View all definitionsMilitary installation resilience is the capability of a military installation to avoid, prepare for, minimize the effect of, adapt to, and recover from extreme weather events, or from anticipated or unanticipated changes in environmental conditions, that do, or have the potential to, adversely affect the military installation or essential transportation, logistical, or other necessary resources outside of the military installation that are necessary in order to maintain, improve, or rapidly reestablish installation mission assurance and mission-essential functions, as defined in 10 U.S.C. 101 (e)(8).
View all definitionsThe Legal Authority
In FY 2003, Congress gave the Military Services the authority to enter into agreements with qualified organizations and non-federal agencies to limit encroachment by enacting Section 2684a of Title 10 of the U.S.C. Congress expanded the 2684a authority in the FY 2019 National Defense Authorization Act to include agreements that enhance or improve military installation resilience. Under this authority, qualified partners include state or local governments or private conservation organizations. These partners share the cost of purchasing easements or other interests in land, or water rights, from willing sellers. The authority allows these cost-sharing partnerships to acquire a real property interest for one of three purposes:
-
To limit any development or use that is incompatible with the mission of the installation;
-
To preserve habitat to relieve current or anticipated restrictions on military activities; or
-
To enhance or improve military installation resilience from extreme weather events or from changes in environmental conditions that may impact military activities.
DOD Roles and Responsibilities
While OSD provides program guidance, interpretation of the law, funding through the REPI proposal process (Congressional funding), internal and external coordination, and reports accomplishments to Congress, each Military Service manages its own encroachment management program.
Understanding that REPI is just one tool in the Military Service’s encroachment management toolbox, they identify mission priorities, submit projects for funding, identify partners and willing sellers, establish and maintain partner agreements, conduct transactions, maintain real property interests, and report accomplishments to OSD.
The Military Services can also fund projects independent of REPI Program funding. For more information on the individual Military Service implementation programs, see the appendix.
REPI Funding Sources
Most encroachment management projects are multi-year efforts, and the ability to leverage funds and resources is a key to building a solid foundation for success. Funding for these projects comes from DOD and our partners. Under the legal authority, the DOD contribution must come out of annual Operations and Maintenance (O&M) funding. DOD funding can include Research, Development, Test, & Evaluation (RDT&E) if the installation’s operations are primarily funded using RDT&E funds rather than O&M.
There are two types of DOD funding for REPI projects: (1) Military Service funds or (2) REPI Program funds that are identified by Congress in a line-item in the DOD budget. The OSD oversees and administers the REPI Program by issuing guidance, defining DOD-wide policies and priorities, and providing the congressional funds to the Military Services, who then implement the projects.
REPI Program funds are multiplied by cost share from outside funds, which account for approximately 47 percent of total project costs since Fiscal Year 2003. While there is no cost share minimum requirement, the individual Military Services may have their own targets. Partner contributions include other federal grants, state and local grants or cost share programs, private capital from conservation partners, bargain sales or donations from willing landowners, and in-kind services from our partners. Additionally, the REPI statute (10 USC § 2648(a)(h), as amended by the 2014 National Defense Authorization Act), now allows the recipient of REPI funds to use such funds as the match or cost-sharing requirement of any conservation or resilience program of any federal agency (previously limited to U.S. Department of Agriculture and Department of Interior). Leveraging funding from partners is important because the total Military Service funding requirements greatly exceed available funding. This cost share continues to demonstrate the value of REPI partnerships to Congress and the taxpayers.
REPI projects are typically funded through three channels:
-
Military Service Fund are any Army, Navy, Marine Corps, or Air Force Operations and Maintenance funding or exchanged excess for Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) real property.
-
REPI Program Funds are provided by Congress in DOD’s annual budget.
-
Partner Funds include other federal grants, State and local grants or cost share programs, private capital from conservation organizations, bargain sales or donations from willing landowners, and in-kind services from partners. Partner contributions do not need to be cash funds.
REPI Program funds are multiplied by cost share from outside funds, which account for approximately 47 percent of total project costs since Fiscal Year 2003. While there is no cost share minimum requirement, the individual Military Services may have their own targets. Partner contributions include other federal grants, state and local grants or cost share programs, private capital from conservation partners, bargain sales or donations from willing landowners, and in-kind services from our partners. Additionally, 10 U.S.C. § 2648(a)(h) now allows the recipient of REPI funds to use such funds as the match or cost-sharing requirement of any conservation or resilience program of any federal agency (previously limited to U.S. Department of Agriculture and Department of Interior). Leveraging funding from partners is important because the total Military Service funding requirements greatly exceed available funding. This cost share continues to demonstrate the value of REPI partnerships to Congress and the taxpayers.
How Do I Develop and Implement a REPI Project?
DOD Instruction 4715.24, “The Readiness and Environmental Protection Integration (REPI) Program and Encroachment Management,” establishes policy, assigns responsibility, and provides procedures for executing the REPI Program.
A private or governmental entity that provides financial, technical real estate, legal, or other significant support to a Military Service in the pursuit or conduct of a REPI project or transaction. Examples include federal agencies, state and local authorities, national nonprofit.
View all definitionsIncompatible land uses and habitat loss near and adjacent to installations, ranges, and operating areas threaten our ability to provide our military with the most realistic training.
View all definitionsA general term used to indicate a base, fort, camp, range or other DOD facility.
View all definitionsThe area beyond the Clear Zone that possesses a significant potential for accidents.
View all definitionsA surface on the ground or water beginning at the runway end and symmetrical about the runway centerline extended.
View all definitionsAn area of land consisting of a specific plot or plots of land that the Military Service would acquire and report in the REPI database as a single transaction.
View all definitionsThe REPI Program is an internal DOD program, managed by OSD, that supports the partnerships described in this primer. The REPI Program does not provide funding to our partners through an open grants program; rather each Military Service submits project proposals for funding through an online proposal tracker platform using authorized account access. Each Military Service manages a comprehensive portfolio of encroachment management projects and is not required to submit all of those projects for REPI Program funding. The appendix contains details about each Military Service’s process for identifying, reviewing, and approving encroachment management projects.
In general, projects are identified locally at the installation or training and testing range level, but reviewed and approved centrally at the Military Service headquarters level. OSD provides overarching REPI Program policy and guidance, administers REPI funding, and oversees reporting and tracking of Military Service efforts.
Project Proposal Review Process
Click to discover more
Annual Feedback
Step 1
- Installation evaluates encroachment problems and solutions
- Partner(s) identify areas of interest and develop relationships with landowners
Step 2
- Installation prepares plans to address test and training needs and submits proposal to Service Headquarters
- Service Headquarters reviews/approves proposals and determines funding strategy
Step 3
- Service submits REPI proposals to OSD for review by REPI Inter-Service Working Group (ISWG)
- OSD reviews proposals using criteria set in the REPI Guide
Step 4
- OSD determines allocation rankings and distributes funding for Service implementation
Project Implementation, Monitoring, and Reporting
While the focus of REPI projects is to acquire easements or other interests in land, partnerships do not end there. To sustain our ongoing training, testing, and operational capabilities, protection of land and habitat through REPI projects is usually perpetual. To ensure permanence, a partner must plan for easement monitoring, enforcement, and, in some cases, long-term natural resources management. Future costs for natural resources management, monitoring, and enforcement may be placed as a lump sum in an interest-bearing or other investment account.
Click to discover more
Reporting Requirements
Natural Resource Management & Restoration
Easement Monitoring & Enforcement
Note: REPI Program funds are appropriated annually by Congress. This means that all funds MUST be contractually obligated during the Federal FY (ends on September 30) in which they are appropriated by Congress. All transactions must be completed as soon as possible after that obligation, with an expectation of expending all funds no later than 18 months after obligation. Funds must be fully spent within five years of obligation.
Other Complementary Land Use Tools
REPI partnerships are one of many tools in the encroachment management toolbox. Integrating REPI partnerships with some of the other DOD tools and strategies can help further increase land protection, conservation, and cost savings. A few other examples:
Through the Air Installations Compatible Use Zone (AICUZ) and Range Air Installations Compatible Use Zone (RAICUZ) program, air installations work with local governments and the community to educate stakeholders on the air installation’s mission and develop compatible land use recommendations that can inform zoning and local ordinances with the aim of reducing potential accidents and noise impacts to the community. This program designates Accident Potential Zones, Clear Zones, and noise zones at the end of military runways. These are areas of land that need to be compatible with air operations while preserving the health and safety of on-base personnel and the community. The Navy, Marine Corps, and Air Force all use AICUZ criteria to strategically identify parcels in the vicinity of air stations and bases to be protected.
Instead of using REPI Program or O&M funds for DOD contributions to a REPI project transaction, the Military Services can use a property exchange under the authority of 10 U.S.C. § 2869. The 2869 authority allows DOD to convey excess or closed Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) property in exchange for an agreement to acquire real property under the 2684a authority. Excess land can be directly exchanged for land of equal value that will be protected through a REPI partnership, or the excess land can be transferred to a partner who agrees to make a contribution of equivalent value to a REPI project transaction. A land exchange provides DOD the ability to efficiently use limited resources to benefit its mission. Meanwhile, the excess DOD property is returned to the tax rolls or otherwise used for community benefit.
The Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation (OLDCC) (formerly Office of Economic Adjustment) Compatible Use Program is the only program of direct Federal assistance to help states and communities work with the Military Services to promote compatible civilian development in support of the long-term sustainability and operability of military installations, including ranges, special use airspace, military operations areas, and military training routes. OLDCC provides technical and financial assistance to state and local governments to develop a Compatible Use Plan and carry out the recommended strategies to promote compatible civilian development. Through the community-driven Compatible Use Plan development process, adjacent communities and often the state, in partnership with the installation, identify and evaluate a wide range of existing and potential future compatibility challenges that may impair the military mission. The affected communities then develop a strategic action plan to identify specific actions, responsible parties, a proposed timeline, and possible funding sources to address the compatibility challenges. Through a Compatible Use Plan, a Military Service and/or the affected communities may identify an issue for which a REPI project can provide resolution. Thus, the Compatible Use Program serves as a powerful tool for the REPI Program in bringing communities and the military together to address compatible land use issues and needs. More information is available at https://oldcc.gov.
DOD Siting Clearinghouse was established in 2010 to provide a timely, transparent, and repeatable process that can evaluate potential impacts from energy development as well as explore mitigation options that preserve the DOD mission. With the rapid expansion of alternative energy, DOD is increasingly called on to review the compatibility of proposed wind, solar, transmission, and other projects with military activities.
DOD has a structured process for developers to request that DOD conduct mission compatibility evaluations, documented in 32 C.F.R. Part 211. The Clearinghouse's formal review process applies to projects filed with the Secretary of Transportation, under 49 U.S.C. § 44718 (Federal Aviation Administration obstruction evaluation process), as well as other projects proposed for construction within military training routes or special use airspace, whether on private, state, or Federal property, such as Bureau of Land Management lands. The Clearinghouse also provides informal reviews, when requested. This means that a developer, landowner, state, tribal, or other local official may request a preliminary determination in advance of the filing of an application with the Secretary of Transportation. More information can be found on the Clearinghouse website.
Installations work with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and state fish and wildlife agencies to ensure natural resources are managed consistent with proper stewardship and sound science, while complying with legal requirements. To alleviate restrictions on threatened and endangered species habitat, our installations are working beyond their boundaries to attain credits for promoting the conservation and recovery of a listed or potentially listed or its habitat. Installations can consult with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service according to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act to accrue credits and alleviate restrictions by showing a measurable contribution to a species’ recovery through equivalent protection on non-DOD lands.
Additionally, DOD has specific regulatory authority to purchase credits directly from conservation banks, mitigation banks, and in-lieu fee programs (10 U.S.C. § 2694c and 10 U.S.C. § 2694d). Mitigation banks and in-lieu fee programs provide compensatory mitigation credits for impacts to wetlands and other aquatic resources. Banks issue credits prior to the impact, while in-lieu fee mitigation is implemented after the impact from the DOD activity. Under recovery credit systems, DOD serves as the bank. Recognition of DOD’s authority to use recovery credit systems is provided in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service guidance (73 Fed. Reg. 148, p. 44761-44772).
Click to discover more
The red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) is an endangered bird that inhabits the open pine forests (mainly longleaf pine) of the Southeast from New Jersey, Maryland and Virginia to Florida, West to Texas and North to portions of Oklahoma, Missouri, Tennessee and Kentucky. The RCW is a non-migratory species that makes its home (cavities) in mature pine forests. These birds are considered ‘keystone’ species because the use of their cavities by other species contributes to the richness of the pine forest.
Gopher tortoises are currently endangered in the Southeast Region of the U.S. and threatened in other parts across the country. Each tortoise will dig and use many burrows throughout the active season; these burrows also provide refuge for about 360 other species throughout its range. Gopher tortoises thrive in relatively deep, sandy, soils and in longleaf pine forests. Threats include habitat fragmentation and degradation, predation, inadequacy of regulatory mechanisms, road kill, and incompatible use of herbicides in forest management.
The checkerspot butterfly is currently a threatened species in the Northwest region of the U.S. that likely to become endangered in the foreseeable future. Checkerspot butterflies exist on shallow, serpentine-derived soil. Threats include habitat loss and fragmentation, invasion of exotic/invasive plants, nitrogen deposition, pesticide application (including drift), illegal collecting, fire, overgrazing, and gopher control.
What else does the REPI Program support?
REPI newsletters are written to provide our partners—military and civilian alike—with important updates, useful information, upcoming events, and a look into what REPI projects and partners are accomplishing across the country. Previous newsletters are available here. If you are not already signed up for REPI's mailing list, you can do so here.
A general term used to indicate a base, fort, camp, range or other DOD facility.
View all definitionsIncompatible land uses and habitat loss near and adjacent to installations, ranges, and operating areas threaten our ability to provide our military with the most realistic training.
View all definitionsA private or governmental entity that provides financial, technical real estate, legal, or other significant support to a Military Service in the pursuit or conduct of a REPI project or transaction. Examples include federal agencies, state and local authorities, national nonprofit.
View all definitionsA significant component of the REPI Program involves engaging with our partners and other stakeholders to help advance understanding of each other’s missions. Key partners to the REPI Program include the National Conference of State Legislatures, the National Association of Counties, the Association of Defense Communities, Land Trust Alliance, and the National Association of State Departments of Agriculture. Educational programs and materials include helpful tools and training like community forums; site visits of ranges and installations; newsletters; workshops and other trainings sessions; a robust webinar series that addresses best practices, tutorials, and capacity building on REPI partnerships; the REPI Program’s web mapping application; an interactive story map highlighting the program’s significant accomplishments through a narrated series of maps and pictures; and the REPI Program’s “primer” series, developed in partnership with a number of national partners. Primers, like this one, provide a chance to go in-depth with particular topics. You can download electronic copies for free at https://www.repi.mil/Resources/Primers/. You may also request printed copies by sending an email to osd.repi@mail.mil. More information on these resources is available at REPI.mil.
Individual REPI projects can create greater and multiple benefits by expanding and coordinating their efforts and activities in the form of regional partnerships and landscape-scale initiatives. By promoting cross-boundary collaboration on planning and land use issues, REPI partnerships can enhance sustainability efforts of a broader scale and scope. To this end, DOD is a partner in two multi-state, multi-agency partnerships in rapidly growing areas of the country with significant DOD land presence: the Southeast and the Southwest regions of the U.S.
The Southeast Regional Partnership for Planning and Sustainability (SERPPAS) brings together senior leadership from southeastern states (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Mississippi) and federal agencies to work collectively on regional planning, conservation, economic, and sustainability issues.
Similarly, the Western Regional Partnership (WRP) provides opportunities for state, federal, and Tribal leadership in California, Colorado, Arizona, Nevada, Utah, and New Mexico to come together to discuss common issues and seek collaborative solutions.
DOD, together with the Departments of Agriculture (USDA) and the Interior (DOI) established the Sentinel Landscapes Partnership in 2013 through a Memorandum of Understanding. This nationwide Federal, local, and private partnership is dedicated to promoting natural resource sustainability and the preservation of agriculture and conservation land uses in areas surrounding military installations. Agencies from DOD, USDA, and DOI coordinate the Partnership at the national level through the Sentinel Landscapes Federal Coordination Committee (FCC), to identify and designate shared interests within a Landscape in order to coordinate strategies to preserve, enhance or protect habitat and working lands near military installations in order to reduce, prevent or eliminate restrictions due to development pressures that inhibit military testing and training.
The Partnership seeks to recognize and incentivize landowners to continue maintaining these landscapes and use taxpayer dollars more efficiently. Although no dedicated funding accompanies Landscape designation, individual partner agencies may choose to provide program-specific funding or prioritize consideration in existing funding processes to landowners within a designated Landscape. Additionally, a designation will lead to improved recognition at the local, state, and national level for projects within a Landscape and provide an opportunity to better target collective resources and possibly develop new technical and financial assistance options tailored to address local needs.
The Result: More Success for Everyone
The REPI Program’s outreach and engagement efforts increase understanding of the mutual benefits REPI partnerships provide and also attract more resources and partners to more projects. They provide tools for more effective application of solutions to reduce and prevent encroachment on military installations and to meet partner goals. The net result is more conservation of natural resources, better land use planning, and longer-term benefits for communities, stakeholders, and the military.
What are key steps in developing a REPI encroachment management partnership?
The following are 10 key steps to help develop a successful partnership:
Lessons Learned
The following are some recommendations gained from the valuable feedback of our partners and installations who have successfully completed REPI project transactions:
- Establish contacts between installation, regional military office, and local community stakeholders—stable points of contact improve the process and communication.
- Keep communication open and provide updates on a regular basis.
- Make sure everyone has a common understanding and keeps perspective on the partnership’s context and goals.
- Align goals between military and partners to optimize funding and target priorities.
- Be aware of landowner education and biases.
- Involve a partner that can translate the often technical language of the REPI authority to unfamiliar landowners.
- Take time to build trust with other agencies and stakeholders.
- Choose a project that is a priority for all stakeholders involved—increases motivation.
- Develop agreements with all parties contributing funds so that they all agree to the appraiser selected and the guidelines.
- Start the process as soon as possible.
- Build on previous partnerships or other successes.
- Prepare for delays, changes in procedure, and other roadblocks, but don’t get discouraged!
- Seek other funding sources that have the same land preservation goals.
Summary
Incompatible land uses and habitat loss near and adjacent to installations, ranges, and operating areas threaten our ability to provide our military with the most realistic training.
View all definitionsREPI partnerships are one solution for combating encroachment and supporting our Nation’s long-term military readiness, while delivering mutual, multiple benefits to communities and stakeholders.
Through REPI projects, you can support the men and women in uniform who defend our nation as well as their families and communities, enhance military readiness, conserve valuable habitat, preserve working farms and forestland, foster sustainable economies, and protect your local heritage. The REPI Program also provides new opportunities to collaborate with other federal land conservation programs and landscape-scale initiatives. There are many opportunities to come together in partnership with the REPI Program and make a difference.